How To Invest In Defensive Stocks and Beat
The Smart Money - Look To The Charts
What should
a small investor do when it comes to defensive stock
investing? What can the retail investor do to beat the smart
money at their own game. As anyone who frequents my site
knows, I believe in staying with large cap, blue chip
dividend payers. My strategy is
covered here.
To understand defensive stocks
and put in place a strategy that protects you from buying at
over valued levels, you must forget everything you have been
told about the merits of defensive stock investing. You must
think "differently" about defensive stocks than your average
retail investor. Remember that smart money managers buy
these stocks ONLY TO SELL THEM. So why are you always buying
them and holding onto them? Think about the return you will
earn every year by actually buying a quality defensive stock
at under valued prices and selling them TO THE SMART MONEY
MANAGER at over valued prices. This about doing exactly the
opposite of what the smart money manager wants you to do.
To accomplish this you must understand that in
any downturn ALL stocks will fall including the DEFENSIVE
STOCKS. In bear markets every stock sinks. It is a rare
bear, when certain sectors do not fall.
Let's take a look at Johnson and Johnson, one of the
pre-imminent Defensive Stocks heralded by every analysts
worldwide, and how it fared in the
various bear collapses over the past 10 years:
In 2000 JNJ lost 38.1%: If an investor had 10,000 in JNJ
during this period and had bought at the high, it would be
worth $6190.00 without taking any dividends into account.
In 2001 JNJ lost 24%: If an investor had 10,000 in JNJ
during this period and had bought at the high, it would be
worth $7600.00 without taking any dividends into account.
In 2002 JNJ lost 36.9%: If an investor had 10,000 in JNJ
during this period and had bought at the high, it would be
worth $6310.00 without taking any dividends into account.
In 2003 JNJ lost 18.6%: If an investor had 10,000 in JNJ
during this period and had bought at the high, it would be
worth $8140.00 without taking any dividends into account.
In the bear market of 2008 - 2009 JNJ lost 36.4%: If
an investor had 10,000 in JNJ during this period and had
bought at the high, it would be worth $6360.00 without
taking any dividends into account.
In between these bear market collapses, Johnson and Johnson
stock also saw a variety of declines with some being as high
as 11%. But then that's the nature of investing in risky
assets. So now you know that even though many defensive
stocks do not fall as far as the overall market, THEY STILL
FALL CONSIDERABLY. When a stock falls how do you feel? Do
you feel like you want to buy more? No, because we are fed
all the lines like "don't catch a falling knife", or "the
second shoe" to drop, or "we have a lot lower to go", or
"this is the end of equities". But think for a moment. If
the retail investor cannot move defensive stocks because
they do not have the buying power to purchase enough shares
in stocks like Johnson and Johnson, who then is buying all
those shares? Could it be the smart money managers?
Absolutely.
When in 2009 Johnson and Johnson stock reach $46.25, the
dividend of $1.96 gave a return of 4.2%. Yet where were all
the retail investors? They were selling their shares instead
of buying. Isn't JNJ a defensive stock? Does that not mean
it will continue to pay its dividend? Does it not mean that
JNJ is in an industry that is by and large recession proof?
Have they not increased their dividend annually for more
than 25 years? As a small investor it took me a long time to
come to the realization that bear markets were fire sales of
large cap terrific corporations that suddenly were cheap and
paid great dividends. In May of 2009 I was still buying JNJ.
In the end I owned 1500 shares with an average price of
$48.35. I earn 4.0% on my dividends annually and have sold
covered calls far out of the money and earned an additional
4% a year. Total return has been 8% and now in this most
recent push by smart money managers I will unload my shares
for better than $66.00. That means I will earn 36.5% capital
gain on the shares and 16% in dividend payments and covered
calls. My total return will be 52.5% in two years. I unload
my shares because I know based on charts that this stock
will again go "on sale" sometime in the future and I want my
cash free to buy it again. Over the past 10 years I could
have bought JNJ below $50.00 at least 4 times. That's the true power of defensive stock investing.
It also proves that it is myth that an investor has to be
100 percent invested all the time. If over ten years I had
only earned 30% on those 4 trades in Johnson and Johnson, my
annual average for 10 years would have been 12%. Cash is
very often an investment strategy itself.
In order to understand better, I use a simple charting
method to establish OVER VALUED, UNDER VALUED and RETURN
POINTS in my defensive stocks. It's easy to do this in
defensive stocks as most have stable patterns of stock
ranges.
The chart (below) shows Johnson and Johnson over the
last 12 years from 1999 to 2011. Looking back this far,
gives a much clearer picture of Johnson and Johnson stock.
By dividing the stock into three sections - OVER VALUED,
RETURN POINT and UNDER VALUED I get an even better picture
to help decide how and when to invest.
The RETURN POINT shows that in general, an investor could
expect that over the course of several years, JNJ should be
able to recover to around the $57.50 to $59.50 value. That
then is my RETURN POINT. The
OVER VALUED prices are easy to spot since the stock
constantly falls back to the return point. It is the over
valued prices where I use stop losses to eventually unload
the stock I have bought. The UNDER VALUED
prices are also easy to spot, again based on the return
point. It is at the under valued prices where I sell puts to
get stocks at better discounts or during panics such as in
2000 and 2009 I will buy stock and sell far out of the money
covered calls.
Using Charts To Beat The Smart Money
An individual investor needs to understand that chasing
stocks is in the end a losing strategy. The smart money can
push stocks up and down in very short order. Getting in and
out of stocks profitably that smart money is in, is
difficult to do in a consistent fashion. The moves can be
sudden and strong both up and down. As of writing this
article, the smart money has been leaving commodities for a
few weeks now, YET the analysts are just now suddenly
talking up defensive stocks. I can tell from emails I am
receiving that many retail investors are beginning to buy
defensive stocks. But if you recall from Part 1, the smart
money has already bought most of the defensive stock they
wish to own and are now pushing defensive stocks higher, to
entice the smaller investors to get in on the action.
Look at the chart below. Since late March the smart money
managers have been moving out of commodities and at the
same time moving into defensive stocks that just a couple of
months
ago analysts were not commenting much about. I have marked
in a light red circle the periods of selling by smart money
in commodities and the periods of buying in JNJ.
Indeed when JNJ in March fell below $58.00 I was flooded
with emails from put sellers who had sold the $60.00 strike
positions and were closing them with losses. Even analysts
were warning about JNJ at $57.50. But the chart on JNJ
showed no need for concern.
So who was buying JNJ below $58.00 then? Smart money
managers.
Looking at the chart on JNJ it is obvious the sudden move
higher. This is not just related to JNJ, but a host of
defensive stocks. Yet analysts are discussing this
"phenomena" like it is just happening, when in actual fact
the bigger purchases by smart money managers have already
been done.
But it is easy to beat smart money if an investor takes the
time to understand the stock and studies all of the above
charts. Consider these points as you review the above
charts:
1) JNJ even though a "defensive stock" will collapse just
like all stocks in any bear market. Therefore as an
investor, I know that Johnson and Johnson stock will fall
dramatically should selling commence. It will go "on sale".
2) Looking at the charts I can see the over valuation zone in JNJ.
Right now the stock is being pushed higher. I have to ask
myself if there is any point in buying the stock when the
smart money is pushing it into over valued
territory. The answer is simple - NO.
By answering NO, I have ended forever the retail investor's
biggest problem - buying stocks too high.
3) During market contractions, I now know that I can pick a
RETURN POINT. This can give me as an investor a great deal
of confidence to step in and buy some shares when the stock
goes into under-valued territory. In my strategy I sell puts
to try to pick up the shares at an even better discounted
price.
NOW I AM BUYING STOCKS UNDERVALUED! I have beaten the second
worst problem of retail investors - NOT BUYING LOW.
4) I also know from the above charts that JNJ may fall
further than I imagine. Therefore the best way to handle
this is to buy in small lots and NOT USE UP ALL MY CAPITAL
IN A PURCHASE, but to TAKE MY TIME buying stock. Forget
worrying about commission rates. With today's discount
brokers I can buy 100 shares at a time and average my way
into the stock all the way down, because I know when it
recovers that I will make such a large profit that
commissions will be unimportant.
5) I know from the above charts that every collapse in JNJ
has been followed by a recovery. Therefore I can buy with
the confidence of knowing that at some point the stock
should move back to the RETURN POINT.
6) I now know that buy and hold forever for this stock is probably
no longer feasible unless I am content to see the stock move
up and down and perhaps never actually have a decent capital
gain at the end. Therefore I know that after buying the
stock in UNDER VALUED territory, I will hold the stock,
collect the dividend and then once it recovers above the
RETURN POINT, wait for it to move into OVER VALUED territory
and sell the stock.
7) I know from the above charts that there is no need to
ALWAYS BE INVESTED. That if I buy the stock in the UNDER
VALUED territory and sell it when it is OVER VALUED that I
can get a very good return which will more than compensate
me for those times when I am in cash waiting for the stock
to pull back so I can buy JNJ stock in UNDER VALUED
territory again.
8) I KNOW THAT THE STOCK WILL END UP IN UNDER VALUED
TERRITORY SOME TIME - THEREFORE THERE IS NO REASON
EVER TO CHASE THIS STOCK HIGHER.
9) By buying this stock in UNDER VALUED territory I will be
selling it to the smart money, when they push it into OVER
VALUED territory which is exactly OPPOSITE to what the smart
money wants me to do as a small investor.
In the final chart below, is the past 12 months in Johnson
and Johnson stock. It shows 4 opportunities during the year
when an investor following the chart above which showed over
valuation, under valuation and return point could have
made trades based on those valuations. A conservative
approach would have returned 11.8%. However those who use
stop losses could have made considerably more. In all 4
cases an investor would have been in the stock at the low
and sold at the high. This shows that it is not necessary to
always be invested but instead keep capital aside because
opportunities will always present themselves throughout the
year.
SUMMARY
This type of study is very simple to do and does not require
a degree in rocket science, let alone a degree in economics.
For those not interested in buy and selling defensive
stocks, the above charts are an easy way to pick option
strike prices to buy and then sell or for those investors
interested in selling put options, an investor could pick
the appropriate strike price based on the above charts. As
well, if assigned shares an investor can take great
confidence that the stock will, even in a collapse,
eventually move back up to the RETURN POINT, allowing the
investor to consider covered calls as a strategy.
This is a straight forward approach to investing in
defensive stocks and a winning strategy that allows the
small retail investor to beat the smart money managers at
their own game.