June 16
2011 / Research In Motion - Stock Symbol RIM (TSX)
or RIMM (Nasdaq)
Rolling Covered Calls
Down On A Declining Stock
Can It Lessen Losses?
Rolling
Covered Calls Down On A Declining Stock
Today I received an interesting email from a
reader who was caught in Research
In Motion stock in the latest sell off. In that
stock sell off I would have preferred to
purchase puts if I had been in the stock.
Nonetheless the reader explained that he had
many times in the past recovered his positions
in what he felt was a quality company, by
rolling his covered calls lower and biding his
time for a recovery.
He sent me a number of
charts of past stocks, all of which paid a
dividend and were, what I would consider, higher
quality stocks. I did agree with him that
Research In Motion is a large enough company
with plenty of cash and it should survive for
some years to come. I asked him if I could
reprint his Research In Motion covered call
trades and make some comments of my own after
emailing back and forth with him. He agreed and
below are his trades to date.
The investor bought into Research In Motion on Feb 18
2011 which turned out to be the high for the year so
far. I have placed my comments within the chart below.
This is not a strategy I would pursue on a stock that
has lost 50% of its value from Feb 18 2011. Personally I
believe strongly that investors are better off getting
out early or purchasing protective puts. The investor
explained that he hates protective puts as often he has
found that the puts cost more capital and often ended up
expiring worthless, especially if the stock recovers. I
can understand his reasoning as many investors feel the
same way, that protective puts cost too much. It is
always easy in hindsight to see the value of protective
puts. Instead this investor loves to roll his covered
calls lower.
Feb 18
68.90
Bought 1000 shares @
68.90
1000
9.95
68,909.95
Feb 18
68.90
Sold 10 Covered Calls March 66 @ 4.20
COMMENTS: By Selling the March 66 he has protected himself
further and should the stock close at 66.00 he will realize
a profit of $1.30 or 1300.00 less commission - about 1.8%
for the month.
$64.73
22.45
64,732.40
4177.55
4177.55
Mar 8
63.02
Bought to close 10
Covered Calls March 66 @ .45
COMMENTS: The stock fell below the average share value of
$64.73. The investor closed the covered calls and reopened
new ones.
22.45
(472.45)
3705.10
Mar 8
63.02
Sold 10 Covered Calls Apr 62 @ 4.00
COMMENTS: These covered calls are still above the average
share value.
61.23
22.45
61,227.30
3977.55
7682.65
Mar 25
55.76
Bought to close 10 Covered Calls Apr
62 @ .33
COMMENTS: With today's bad news the stock fell $6.70 and the
investor bought back the calls and sold into May
22.45
(352.45)
7330.20
Mar 25
55.76
Sold 10 Covered Calls May
$56 @ 3.20
COMMENTS: These covered calls for $56.00 are BELOW the
investor's average share value
58.40
22.45
58,402.20
3177.55
10507.75
Apr 25
51.02
Bought to close 10 Covered
Calls May $56 @ .38
COMMENTS: The stock has fallen about 8% and the investor
again rolls lower, into June
22.45
(402.45)
10105.30
Apr 25
51.02
Sold 10 Covered Calls Jun
$52.00 @ 2.49
COMMENTS: These are again below his cost basis. By selling
into June, the investor figures that this will buy some time
in case the stock recovers and he has to buy back and roll
out further and possibly back up.
56.34
22.45
56,337.10
2467.55
12572.85
May 2
45.79
Bought to close 10 Covered
Calls Jun $52 @ 1.00
COMMENTS: Despite the 1.00 premium the investor feels that
so much negative news will push the stock lower. He decides
to roll down early.
22.45
(1022.45)
11550.40
May 2
45.79
Sold 10 Covered Calls Jun
$48 @ 1.92
COMMENTS: At $48.00 the investor has locked in a 7000 loss,
if assigned. However the investor assumes the stock will
move lower based on all the negative news and negative
analyst reports. However if he had to buy this call back -
he would roll to Jan $52 which is paying $3.90. This would
put him at break even for the entire trade. (You can see how
some people have exit strategies already in place at the
time of the original trade)
55.46
22.45
55,462.00
1897.55
13447.95
May 24
42.06
Bought to close 10 Covered
Calls Jun $48 @ .37
COMMENTS: The stock is down another 8% from May 2. The
investor buys to close the calls and then rolls into Jul and
down another 4.00
22.45
(392.45)
13055.50
May 24
42.06
Sold 10 Covered Calls Jul
$44 @ $1.74
COMMENTS: The investor is again selling below his average
share value. He is almost $10.00 below his average share
value on the stock. His exit strategy is, if the stock
recovers he will roll out to Jan $52 which is trading for
$2.40. This would bring him back to break even.
54.14
22.45
54,136.90
1717.55
14773.05
Jun 3
38.15
Bought to close 10 Covered
Calls Jul $44 @ .70
22.45
(722.45)
14050.60
Jun 3
38.15
Sold 10 Covered Calls Jul
$40 @ 1.70
53.18
22.45
53181.80
1677.55
15728.15
Jun 14
34.73
Bought to close 10 Covered
Calls Jul $40 @ .71
22.45
(732.45)
14995.70
Jun 14
34.73
Sold 10 Covered Calls Sep
$38 @ $2.20
COMMENTS: He is now selling out to Sep figuring that it
could take the stock some time to recover to the $40.00
range. His exit strategy is if the stock recovers to the
$38.00 he will buy back his Sept covered calls and roll out
to January or longer at $42.00.
51.74
22.45
51,736.70
2177.55
17,173.25
SUMMARY
These are my comments and NOT the comments of the investor who sent these trades to me.
Personally RIM is as I indicated in all my comments about
RIM, not a company to buy and hold stock. It is for traders
who want to trade the shares and for option sellers and
buyers who see opportunity in the options. Research In
Motion is in serious trouble which you can read in many
articles I have on my site. While I understand what the
investor is doing and applaud the investor's fortitude and
his ability to study the option premiums, set up his exit
strategies, plan and stay consistent, I still believe this
is not a stock for investors.
However I wanted to present his trades to show investors
that often you can roll covered calls to follow a stock
down, in a bear market. That said, I would still impress
upon my readers that this strategy is not a substitute for
holding protective puts or if rolling down, to consider
rolling down ONLY on large cap, dividend paying stocks or
ETFs. ETF's have the advantage of never going to zero.